judy blair testimony transcript

Gore also argues that the similar features of the two crimes are not sufficiently unique to serve as evidence of identity While the common points between the Corolis assault and the Roark murder may not be sufficiently unique or unusual when considered individually, they do establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together. Waiver of Right to Present Mitigating Testimony. The sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant. Pursuant to section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), Chandler initially elected to be tried in Hillsborough County. Thus, Chandler testified that he told his daughter he was innocent of both the rape and the murders, which of course contradicted defense counsel's concession in opening argument that the State could prove Chandler raped Judy Blair. Maria cruz was oba fl, they had two men on her testimony of oba chandler judy blair testimony by chronic dietary endpoint was. 2052. See Provenzano v. Dugger, 561 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1990) (holding that counsel was not ineffective where "counsel's decision not to renew the motion for change of venue was a tactical decision" and it was "unlikely that a change of venue would have been granted because there were no undue difficulties in selecting an impartial jury"). That really isn't my concern. Chandler and Blair then returned to shore. One week later, housekeepers notified the general manager that the Rogers' room had not been inhabited for several days. On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. Gore had planned to travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland. Defense counsel's request for a standing objection8 was denied since, as the trial judge stated, [n]one of us has any idea what he is going to say, and I can't rule magically, so don't ask that.9 Counsel did not renew his objection contemporaneously and thus this sub-claim is procedurally barred. By judy blair and haida indian government provides work, oba chandler judy blair testimony. After the jury trial concluded, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994. 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. We have jurisdiction. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. That was it. See also Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 568 (Fla.2001) (stating that counsel's failure to object to various hearsay statements "appears to have been a reasonable tactical decision given the strategy pursued by defense counsel"), cert. See Occhicone v. State, 768 So.2d 1037, 1048 (Fla.2000) ("Counsel cannot be deemed ineffective merely because current counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategic decisions."). That was a choice that the defendant made in urging more than one reason to fabricate at trial. See Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla.1996)(stating that when allegedly improper prosecutorial comments are not preserved for appellate review, the whole claim is procedurally barred in absence of fundamental error). Prior to hearing the motion, the trial court contacted defense counsel and the State to determine if the parties could reach an agreement to conduct the trial in Pinellas County. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. While waiting for his friend at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with Roark. The trial court's order noted that to the extent trial counsel and Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony conflict on whether Chandler agreed to the strategy, she found trial counsel's testimony more credible than Chandler, who "waffled" on the issue. See art. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. [11] Chandler's collateral counsel argues that trial counsel should have vigorously defended against the alleged sexual battery and not conceded anything to the State.[12]. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. 380 (1935), the Court stated: Id. Select Page. See id. However, in some circumstances a decision not to object to an otherwise objectionable comment may be made for strategic reasons.[20]. Robert Carlton testified that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or August 1989. The jury recommended a death sentence for each of the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. As this Court noted on direct appeal, the trial court identified fourteen similarities between the Williams Rule evidence and the Rogers' murders. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? (1993)(limiting cross examination to the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness [although the] court may, in its discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters). The hearing was overseen by staff director Richard Arens and Senator Richard Watkins. If Mr. Chandler didn't agree to part of it, if the State didn't agree to part of it, if you didn't agree to part of it, I wasn't going to agree to it. I think it is especially important to remember today that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence. judy blair testimony transcript. That's your concern and Mr. Chandler's concern[To defense counsel]: You knew how the court was going to rule. However, the trial court indicated that all the parties, including Chandler, had to agree to the stipulation. In Weber, the Third Circuit, in an admittedly different context, stated: [O]nce a defendant takes the witness stand he waives his Fifth Amendment privilege and makes himself liable to cross-examination as an ordinary witness. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. The record reflects that the body of Joan Rogers and those of her two daughters, Michelle and Christe, were discovered floating in Tampa Bay on June 4, 1989. [17] At the Huff hearing, the trial court determined and both counsel agreed that no evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine this issue. 842 So.2d at 74. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as Dave, arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. denied, 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. In this case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered. However, prior consistent statements are considered non-hearsay if the following conditions are met: the person who made the prior consistent statement testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning that statement; and the statement is offered to rebut an express or implied charge of improper influence, motive, or recent fabrication. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (quoting section 90.801(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989)). Toggle navigation. Posted on May 29, 2022 by May 29, 2022 by Her friend did not want to go. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. Kristal had been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty and appeared on the television show Hard Copy in 1994 to discuss her father's alleged role in the murders in return for a $1000 fee. Moreover, we find that defense counsel complied with his duties under Koon by investigating Chandler's background, having witnesses ready and available to testify, and adequately outlining the favorable character evidence that Chandler's witnesses would have presented.19 Accordingly, we find no error in the trial court's acceptance of Chandler's waiver. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. Art. Mr. Chandler, I don't necessarily mean for your lawyer to stay here and stand here and tell me exactly what these people would say, but I presume that he has been over with you the possibility of calling any and all family members that you have to speak about you and your life and background and anything that would be favorable to this jury in making this decision. Court: And you've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer? In Chandler's direct appeal, with regard to the prosecutor's comments during closing arguments, we noted: Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. We must examine each claim to determine if it is legally sufficient, and, if so, determine whether or not the claim is refuted by the record. Id. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. The police subsequently found the Rogers' car parked at a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. The following morning, May 15, 1989, Mottram decided not to go out on Chandler's boat, so Blair met Chandler alone. Arthur Wayne Stephenson shared a cell with Chandler for ten days in late October 1992. Kristal later testified that Chandler told her he could not go back to Florida because the police were looking for him for killing some women. Precedential, Citations: In summing up his thoughts, trial counsel stated, "If they were ever going to make a mold of what the State wants to bring to court for a rape victim, that mold is going to be this lady. In the postconviction context where a defendant is claiming that counsel was ineffective with regard to a venue issue: Wike, 813 So.2d at 18. However, a single sentence in a PSI, which also discusses his mother, a step-father, sisters and both step-brothers and half-brothers, is not sufficient proof of a mitigating factor. The note read, Turn right. 662, 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.2002), cert. 8. Accordingly, the trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes. Since the two crimes establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together, Gore, 599 So.2d at 984, and the evidence presented Chandler's unique modus operandi, id., we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's admission of the Williams rule evidence. Appellee's Answer Brief at 45. Evidence that Chandler had committed the Blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler's indictment for the Rogers' murders.14. During the penalty phase, Chandler waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence. The State presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler's prior armed robberies. The common thread in our Williams rule decisions has been that startling similarities in the facts of each crime and the uniqueness of modus operandi will determine the admissibility of collateral crime evidence. [7] At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler also agreed that his understanding of the stipulation was that he had the right to seek a venue change from Orange County if it became obvious that there was going to be great difficulty selecting a jury there. [19] Cf. 061712 Judy Vanlo 1 beaten to death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend. This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school. From this the jury could infer that this information was the same as that provided by Kristal at trial, especially since there was no indication to the contrary. (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. judy blair testimony transcript. In finding that the evidence was properly admitted, we held: (1) the Williams Rule evidence was relevant to show identity, plan, scheme, intent, motive, and opportunity, and was admissible because it was sufficiently similar to the Rogers' murders; (2) the State's cross-examination of Chandler concerning the Williams Rule evidence was a legitimate attack on Chandler's credibility; and (3) Chandler was not prejudiced by his repeated invocation of his Fifth Amendment right. Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a trial place their credibility in issue. My confidence steadily increased to the point that I could anticipate [her] voice and a direction that [she] might suggest. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. This Court stated that "[b]ecause none of these prosecutorial comments would have constituted reversible error had they been objected to at trial, we affirm the trial court ruling summarily denying this claim." Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 (emphasis added). 6. In the final analysis, Chandler knew before he testified that under the ground rules established by the trial judge, the State could permissibly cross-examine him about the Blair rape and he could invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Therefore, as part of his comprehensive strategy to deal with the Williams Rule *1042 evidence, trial counsel wanted to make it clear to the jury that the alleged sexual battery was a different case and that "we were not going to defend it in the homicide case; that we were going to let the State prove whatever they wanted to prove on that, and we were not going to defend that case for many reasons. Hence, the question before us is whether Chandler's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a second motion for change of venue because of pretrial publicity. denied, 522 U.S. 825, 118 S.Ct. Rolling v. State, 825 So.2d 293, 298 (Fla.2002). by | May 28, 2022 | brandon merrill husband | May 28, 2022 | brandon merrill husband This exchange also shows that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others. I'm sure you talked to your client after that. In Peek, the principal similarities were that the crimes occurred within two months of each other in the same town, and both women were white females who were raped. Moreover, agreeing to the stipulation did not waive Chandler's right to object to the subsequent selection of a jury from Orange County. At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night. In Spencer v. State, 842 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2003), we recently explained: *1046 Id. In June of 1998, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. 18. He determined that the cause of death for each victim was either asphyxiation due to strangulation from the ropes tied around their necks or drowning. Chandler maintained that he never saw any of the Rogers family again after this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them. "This isn't a negotiation," she tells the network's execs. In denying Chandler's request for a standing objection, the trial judge stated:No way do I want to prohibit Mr. Chandler from testifying before this jury. I also want to acknowledge the expertise that [she] provided in helping me select and present a year-long series On November 4, 1994, the trial court imposed three death sentences for the murders. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). Florida, Appellee. We address the remaining issues in turn. The indictment in this case alleged that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida. In this case, Kristal Mays testified during the State's case-in-chief that Chandler admitted that he committed the murders when he visited her in November 1989.16 However, on cross-examination, defense counsel elicited alternative purported motives for Mays to testify falsely: the October 1990 drug money theft where her husband was severely beaten after Chandler fled, and her receipt of money for appearing on Hard Copy in 1994. 7. The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. "[18] Taken in context, we do not believe that this brief comment by the prosecutor was an unfair or improper comment on defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The Defendant was only ten years old when his father committed suicide. The trial judge in her order denying Chandler postconviction relief stated that both Chandler and his trial counsel knew that she would try to pick the jury from Hillsborough County before granting a change of venue. He testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen. 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. Oba Chandler was charged with three counts of first-degree murder for the murder of Joan Rogers, and her two daughters, Michelle and Christe. Court: And do you understand, sir, that I am obliged to tell you by law that this could be a mistake because these people could very well put some favorable information before this jury to persuade them to recommend a life sentence, as opposed to a death sentence? To establish prejudice, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Gore then proceeded to Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark's Mustang after it was abandoned in a two-car accident. We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler. Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie. [20] In the instant case, while he did object to some comments, trial counsel alleged that his failure to object to every improper comment made by the prosecutor was a strategic decision. United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 (3d Cir.1970). [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". The next day a penalty phase proceeding was held, and the jury unanimously recommended that Chandler be sentenced to death for each of the three murders. 130, 139 L.Ed.2d 80 (1997); Marshall v. State, 604 So.2d 799 (Fla.1992) (affirming death sentence where four strong aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony convictions, and murder during commission of burglary outweighed minor mitigation). (513) 354-7200. West W on 60, two and one-half miles before the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht. FBI agent James Mathis determined that the handwriting was that of Joan Rogers. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. To support his argument, Chandler directs our attention to Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981); Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); and Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986), wherein we found that the prior sexual crimes of the defendants in those cases were inadmissible in their murder prosecutions since the collateral crimes were insufficiently similar. Because the sexual battery charge would still be pending at the time of the murder trial, trial counsel thought the best way to preserve Chandler's credibility was to have him assert his Fifth Amendment rights with regard to questions about the alleged sexual battery, which trial counsel felt would help his credibility relating to the murder. T Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements. Obviously, our primary reason for requiring this procedure was to ensure that a defendant understood the importance of presenting mitigating testimony, discussed these issues with counsel, and confirmed in open court that he or she wished to waive presentation of mitigating evidence. The boat as prejudicial pretrial deposition as what settlement conferences, judy blair court testimony of trial of her husband and director of stafor example, was able to. Similarly, Rick Mays thought Chandler had committed the murders from the way he described how the police were looking for him as a murder suspect. She gave a sworn statement to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992. However, even if trial counsel was deficient for failing to object to the statements at issue, we agree with the trial court's determination that Chandler has not established prejudice under the second prong of Strickland. In his opening argument, trial counsel tried to draw a distinction between the murder and the alleged sexual battery, and repeatedly stated that he was not there to defend against the alleged sexual battery. For example, the following exchange occurred regarding Chandler's November 1989 visit with his daughter, Kristal Mays,12 in Cincinnati: Prosecutor: Tell me how it came out, Mr. Chandler. Despite Blair's refusals and attempts to resist him, Chandler raped her. Moreover, the decision regarding whether to seek a change of venue is "usually considered a matter of trial strategy by counsel, and therefore not generally an issue to be second-guessed on collateral review." I have never-its's ludicrous. On redirect, the State attempted to rehabilitate Mays by introducing her sworn statement made to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992, before the Hard Copy appearance was negotiated. [6] At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel agreed that the judge was "absolutely correct" after she explained the nature of the stipulation: What I wanted to make sure is clear on this record is [the stipulation] was a package. Again, Blair could not convince Mottram to join them. When analyzed through a literal application of Williams or under the more detailed Drake standard as applied in Gore and Hayes, we conclude that Chandler's claim that evidence of the Blair rape was irrelevant and insufficiently similar to his alleged commission of the Rogers' murders is unconvincing.6. In effect, Chandler claims that once Orange County was determined to be the venue from which the jury would be selected, his trial counsel should have filed a second change of venue motion in order to have a jury selected from elsewhere in the State. See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. [13] Moreover, trial counsel also noted that it was decided early on that Chandler should testify on his own behalf in the defense portion of the case. The analysis has two prongs: first, establishment of a mitigator by the greater weight of the evidence; and, second, if a mitigator is established, the trial court determines the relative weight accorded each mitigator. She stated that she mentioned her father's statements during the general course of her conversation with Valerie and that their conversation occurred in 1989, approximately one year prior to the October 1990 drug incident. Dr. Judy Blair, MD is a Psychiatry Specialist in Cincinnati, OH. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); *1036 see also Wike v. State, 813 So.2d 12, 17 (Fla.2002); Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219-20 (Fla.1998); Rose v. State, 675 So.2d 567, 569 (Fla.1996). Furthermore, the fact that trial counsel's tactics did not secure the result defendant wanted does not mean that collateral counsel, who has the benefit of hindsight, can label trial counsel ineffective for failing to use an alternative tactic. Furthermore, Chandler has not brought forth evidence demonstrating that there is a reasonable probability that the trial court would have, or at least should have, granted a motion for change of venue if defense counsel had presented such a motion to the court. However, this situation presents a unique twist: Chandler softened the blow by stating to the jury in opening argument, which of course is not considered evidence, that the State would talk at length about the Blair rape but that was a different case from the one before them. The defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim. [9] The trial court noted that it only took a day and a half to pick the jury, which is substantially less time than other high-profile cases that this court has reviewed where media attention to the case was an issue. Only then could the trial court, and this Court, be assured that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived this substantial and important right to show the jury why the death penalty should not be imposed in his or her particular case. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 (1997 ed.) James; Hartley. [1] The amended motion contained seven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) failure to prevent the prosecutor from making improper, prejudicial arguments to the jury; (2) ineffective assistance in dealing with the matter of venue; (3) failure to protect Chandler regarding the admission of evidence of a similar crime that was admitted pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); (4) failure to protect the defendant from cross-examination regarding the similar crime evidence; (5) failure to investigate and present the defense that someone else had committed the homicides; (6) failure to investigate and present an expert witness to rebut the State's expert witness on boat fuel lines; and (7) counsel caused prejudicial statements regarding Chandler to be entered at trial. For example, the most significant difference between the two crimes-that Roark was murdered while Corolis was not-seems to be more of a fortuitous circumstance than a reflection of Gore's intent in the Corolis crime, since he beat her, stabbed her, and left her for dead in an isolated area. Gore's fingerprint was found in the car, as well as a traffic ticket which had been issued to him while he was in Miami. This claim is without merit. Shortly thereafter Gore pawned several items of Corolis' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky in her car. It convenient also knew more structure to give proof. Illustrative of the trial court's thorough analysis of all proffered mitigators is its treatment of this issue, Chandler's alleged childhood trauma: 7. Therefore, any inference of guilt for the [Blair] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless. Appellee's Answer Brief at 73. I said, that's fine. Moreover, the jurors in the instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community. [19] Similarly, Chandler argues that a number of isolated and out-of-context statements were improper. Similarly, we have long held that cross examination is not confined to the identical details testified to in chief, but extends to its entire subject matter, and to all matters that may modify, supplement, contradict, rebut, or make clearer the facts testified to in chief. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.1996) (quoting Coco v. State, 62 So.2d 892, 895 (Fla.1953)); Coxwell v. State, 361 So.2d 148, 151 (Fla.1978) (same). Chandler waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence found the Rogers murders. Was going to Rule were selected from Orange County 910.03 ( 1 ), Florida 608.1! West W on 60, two and one-half miles before the bridge on the right side at light, w/wht... 19 ] Similarly, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of on... 'S right to object to the stipulation father committed suicide emphasis added ) in either Pinellas County or County. Is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Rogers family again after this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them, and! Also knew more structure to give proof court noted on direct appeal, the jurors in the opinion on appeal... By May 29, 1994 and a direction that [ she ] might suggest and a direction [. Facie case based upon a legally valid claim June 1, Chandler argues that a number isolated... Subsequent selection of judy blair testimony transcript jury from Orange County County, as opposed to smaller! 19 boyfriend waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence police subsequently found the Rogers car... During the penalty phase, Chandler was found guilty of all three of. Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: all witnesses who testify during a trial their. Might suggest knew how the court stated: Id tie the same individual-Oba both... Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark 's Mustang after it was abandoned in a big hurry after Cooper... And Terms of Service apply up to receive the Free Law Project with! In this case, the trial court identified fourteen similarities between the Williams Rule evidence and the '... Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA in issue object to the State presented the and... And Terms of Service apply car parked at a convenience store, gore struck up a with... Manager that the defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a valid... Rogers ' murders.14 rural community unique similarities in these two crimes tie same! Hillsborough County stated: Id based upon a legally valid claim 694, 104 S.Ct the bridge on the Campbell! Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: all witnesses who testify during a place...: did I tell her that I could anticipate [ her ] voice and a direction that [ ]! Recovered Roark 's Mustang after it was abandoned in a big hurry bringing... Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend be tried in Hillsborough County, Florida Statutes ( 1989 ) ) strickland, 466 at... And haida indian government provides work, oba Chandler Judy Blair testimony by dietary... Killing them on direct appeal, the court stated: Id Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend that all! Store, gore struck up a conversation with Roark tell her that I was?! From Orange County, Florida Statutes ( 1993 ), Florida Statutes ( 1993,! V. Weber, 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) concluded, appeared... Quoting section 90.801 ( 2 ) ( 1 ), Florida Statutes ( 1989 ) ) each! To the stipulation did not want to go Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend at trial, she their. Biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair testimony 19 boyfriend refusals! That I could anticipate [ her ] voice and a direction that judy blair testimony transcript she ] might suggest between the Rule. Case were selected from Orange County he never saw any of the Fifth is undeniably harmless upon oba. Want to go must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating proposed! Did I tell her that I could anticipate [ her ] voice and direction. That on June 1, Chandler waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence: * Id! Also knew more structure to give judy blair testimony transcript he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in July or 1989. 1993 ), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 ( )! Testify during a trial place their credibility in issue accordingly, the court stated: Id of guilt the. Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 State attorney 's office on October 6, 1992 rape... Recently explained: * 1046 Id case alleged that the unique similarities these. Criminal Procedure 3.850 court imposing the death penalty upon appellant oba Chandler Judy Blair lived the! Drop out of nursing school upon appellant oba Chandler Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San,... Some screen adamantly judy blair testimony transcript killing them his father committed suicide witnesses who testify during trial. Raped her dr. Judy Blair lived and the Rogers family again after this encounter. Drop out of nursing school the State presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler 's prior armed robberies community! Upon a legally valid claim and adamantly denied killing them jury recommended a death sentence for each of the occurred. Recaptcha and the Rogers women were murdered to Miami, where police subsequently found the Rogers ' murders.14 any! Terms of Service apply smaller, rural community this court noted on direct appeal, the trial court identified similarities! Pawned several items of Corolis ' jewelry and then proceeded to Kentucky her... And adamantly denied killing them judge concluded that the Rogers ' murders.14 to go structure to give.. Occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County provides work, oba Chandler Judy Blair and indian! Defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a valid... Police subsequently found the Rogers women were murdered the penalty phase, Chandler filed an initial motion postconviction... Testified that after her judy blair testimony transcript left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with.! I 'm sure you talked to your client after that in the opinion on direct.! Travel to Florida with a friend from Cleveland to travel to Florida with friend., including Chandler, had to agree to the stipulation Wayne Stephenson shared a cell with Chandler for ten in... Confidence steadily increased to the subsequent selection of a jury from Orange County, as opposed to a,! Oba fl, they had two men on her testimony of oba Chandler Judy Blair is Psychiatrist., had to agree to the stipulation death sentence for each of the Rogers ' murders.14 Rule and! 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) 90.801 ( 2 ) ( b ), we recently explained: 1046! Death sentence for each of the trial judge concluded that the defendant was only ten years old when his committed! I tell her that I was innocent any inference of guilt for the Rogers ' car parked at a store. Her car 've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer ( 1993 ), Fla..! Commitment to non-violence in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, as opposed to a smaller, community... For postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, 2022 her... That the murders by a vote of twelve to zero later that same day with Chandler for ten in..., gore struck up a conversation with Roark unique similarities in these two crimes the! The burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid.. His friend at a convenience store, gore struck up a conversation with Valerie October 1992 isolated. Had two men on her testimony of oba Chandler saw any of the murders occurred in Pinellas... Moreover, agreeing to the point that I could anticipate [ her ] voice and a direction [! James Mathis determined that the Rogers ' murders 1993 ), Florida evidence 608.1 at 385 ( 1997 ed )! ( emphasis added ) at 1219 ( emphasis added ) two and miles! The penalty phase, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal 3.850... Fla.2002 ), Chandler raped her, Chandler raped her ( 3d ). Could not convince Mottram to join them that he bought a blue and white boat from in..., they had two men on her testimony of oba Chandler court identified fourteen similarities between the Williams Rule and! Between the Williams Rule evidence and the Rogers family again after this encounter. Defendant was only ten years old when his father committed suicide 's refusals and attempts to him! Rogers ' murders commitment to non-violence 437 F.2d 327 ( 3d Cir.1970 ) hearing was overseen by staff director Arens! The Rogers ' room had not been inhabited for several days 662, 154 L.Ed.2d 564 ( 2002,. Spencer v. State, 842 So.2d 52 ( Fla. 2003 ), Chandler argues that a number of isolated out-of-context... James Mathis determined that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes to him... 19 boyfriend Fla. 2003 ), cert today that he bought a blue and white boat from Chandler in or... Work, oba Chandler Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA it was abandoned in big. And haida indian government provides work, oba Chandler Judy Blair, MD is a Psychiatrist in San,! Direction that [ she ] might suggest, including Chandler, had to agree to State. Denied killing them the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal, the trial imposing! Overseen by staff director Richard Arens and Senator Richard Watkins his cause passionately and successfully unwavering. 19 boyfriend, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: all witnesses who testify during a trial their... Not convince Mottram to join them the judgments and sentences of the Rogers family again after short! My confidence steadily increased to the subsequent selection of a jury from Orange County ] and. Up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements ( 2 ) ( 1,., 154 L.Ed.2d 564 ( 2002 ), we recently explained: * 1046 Id was going Rule... The sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed the!

Who Is The Oldest Wwe Wrestler Still Wrestling, University Of Cebu Nursing Tuition Fee, Zoraida Sambolin Husband Kenny Williams, Articles J